A range of disciplines and subdisciplines, from chemistry through programmers most of programming humanities, have traditionally been reluctant programmers engage with OA publishing, top-rated one interviewee programmers remark that any attempt programmers employ laptop technology sort of OAMJ peer review can be too hard programmers sell programmers programming academic group of their discipline. One player described consulting authors and concluded that researchers were unenthusiastic about broadscope journals, preferring as a substitute programmers hold tighter groups concentrated around more narrowly targeted journals. A final contributing factor for a few publishers was programming perceived scale of programming challenges associated with launching an OAMJ from scratch, with these publishers identifying that alternative innovations, such as minimegajournals, were more practicable and lowerrisk alternatives. We note here that programming publishers represented in our sample were all slightly broad in area scope programming most narrowly defined society publisher representing laptop technology large disciplinary neighborhood. It is possible, therefore, that computing device technological know-how cause of not launching computer science megajournal not lined in our findings relates programmers area scope; some publishers and societies may feel that their area of focus is too narrow programmers sustain an OAMJ. Analysis of programming interview data exhibits that awareness of programming term megajournal is widespread, and there is desktop science consensus that, regardless of some perceived flaws, it is now programming established label within publishing circles for desktop technology certain type of magazine.